🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to send state military units in the city. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities maintain that local officers have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as a conflict zone, locals have been posting footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, preventing the physical sending of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the president cannot dispatch the military into American urban areas without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, principles, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the judicial system.”